theLLMs

Practical AI, minus the fog machine

Understand LLMs well enough to make better decisions.

theLLMs is a guide site for people trying to use, buy, build with, or explain modern AI systems. It focuses on what the tools do, what they cost, where they fail, and how to test them before trusting them.

Date-scoped sources, explicit methodology, and clear caveats on every serious claim. How this site is made →

Coverage

Broad enough to be useful, weird enough not to become an AI junk drawer

Cache

Concepts, ideas, mental models, and knowledge snippets. The stuff you want loaded before someone says “just add AI”.

Run

Step-by-step workflows for teams using LLMs in coding, support, search, RAG, evaluation, agents, and internal operations.

Diff

Dated context: what changed, who should care, and what remains unproved., pricing moves, policy changes, benchmark claims, and provider shifts. Diff with a “so what?” attached.

Model and tool comparisons

Decision-first comparisons covering model families, coding agents, inference hosts, vector stacks, eval tools, orchestration layers, and cost trade-offs.

Use cases and business adoption

Where LLMs help, where they fail, what decisions matter, and how teams avoid buying a very expensive autocomplete-shaped theatre set.

Tokens, pricing, evals, and benchmarks

Cost control, quality checks, latency trade-offs, prompt caching, eval harnesses, and benchmark interpretation without cargo-culting leaderboards.

Coding agents and deployment patterns

Hands-on notes for agent loops, tool use, MCP, local development, inference deployment, observability, and production guardrails.

Reader jobs

Questions the site should answer without hand-waving

Browse

Pick the lane closest to the decision you need to make

Cache

Concepts, explainers, comparisons and mental models for the things AI people say too quickly.

Run

Practical workflows: choosing a model, testing RAG, pricing a feature, or running an agent safely.

Diff

Short context pieces that answer what changed, who should care, and what evidence is still missing.

100-page programme

100/100 briefed, drafted, reviewed, and integrated. The full programme is live.

How it is made

The site is transparent about AI-assisted writing, model-labelled writer and editor roles, and human review rather than pretending prose appears by magic.